Session 4

Today we learnt more about the different instruments for measuring or assessing the Learning Environment. The key learning point today is:

1. Why modify existing learning environment validated instruments

2. How to modify existing learning environment validated instruments

I realised that sometimes it is necessary to change some words in the instruments to suit it to the context. At times, the dimension/scales assessed are not suitable due to the profile of the target audience. For example, from the case study, the dimension of ‘uncertainty’ in a Science or Math class of average or low ability students may not be appropriate to assess.

Another example would be the use of the word ‘complain’ in the statement of the instruments’ items. Personally, I would replace the word ‘complain’ with ‘feedback’ or ‘question’. I think it is better to phrase a word in a neutral or positive way because students must not have the impression that they are allowed to complain as and when they want to. If surveys are phrased that way (negatively), it may seem that students are actually expected to live up to the statements, which in this case is to complain.

Dr Quek reminded us that even though we can modify LE validated instruments, we have to ensure that the changes made do not change the original meaning of the statement.